About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  Prosecutors Gone Wild
Prosecutors Gone Wild
Print Mail
By Ted Frank
Posted: Thursday, July 24, 2008
ARTICLES
The American Spectator  (July/August 2008)
Publication Date: July 1, 2008

 
Resident Fellow
 Ted Frank
 
On March 10, 2008, the New York Times broke the story that New York's governor, Eliot Spitzer, was the unnamed "Client No. 9" listed in a federal indictment involving a prostitution ring called the Emperor's Club. Spitzer's bull-in-a-china-shop tenure as governor made him many enemies in both parties, so his unsuccessful term ended with his resignation just two days later to preempt an inevitable impeachment. Press coverage was still focused on details of the rendezvous at Washington's swanky Mayflower hotel, the role of the suffering-but-loyal wife in sex scandals, and the identity of the vapid femme fatale call girl, when the new governor, David Paterson, took office and dominated the news cycle with his own confessions of tit-for-tat extramarital affairs in the considerably less swanky Days Inn.

Spitzer's fall was so swift that the press barely got around to scrutinizing the tactics of the Department of Justice, quickly dropping the topic as it became yesterday's news. Prosecutors made it clear to the governor's attorney that Spitzer would be more likely to be indicted for a variety of technical financial offenses if he insisted on remaining in office, using the leverage of discretionary criminal charges to bypass the courts and get a resignation. Only one out of ten clients mentioned in the affidavit received particular attention. Client No. 9's sexual predilections and negotiations were described in humiliatingly prurient detail irrelevant to the underlying charges, his identity was leaked, and additional data about the governor's peccadilloes seeped out of the prosecutors' office over the course of the week. Prosecutors, without filing a single official document implicating Spitzer by name, forced him out of office. (In one of the few news stories to explore why the Department of Justice had engaged in extensive labor-intensive surveillance of Spitzer on multiple business trips, officials told the New York Times that they were actually restrained because they didn't try to record the tryst or collect DNA evidence from the hotel room.) . . .

Download file Click here for the full text of this article as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Ted Frank is a resident fellow at AEI.

Related Links
Related article on the work of Eliot Spitzer by Jon Entine
Related book review by Frank: See You in Court: How the Right Made America a Lawsuit Nation
Related event on Eliot Spitzer
AEI Print Index No. 23364


Also by Ted Frank
Recent Articles
Jackpot Justice Gets New Meaning
The Trouble with the Civil Gideon Movement
The Inverted Federalism of Grider v. Compaq
Education Outlook

Education Outlook small (small, for highlight)  

In the August issue of Education Outlook, Frederick M. Hess looks at mayoral control of troubled, urban school systems.


Real Education
Real Education

In his new book, Real Education: Four Simple Truths for Bringing America's Schools Back to Reality, AEI's Charles Murray focuses on four simple, hard truths that are rarely discussed or even acknowledged by educators and politicians.