About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  The Vioxx Litigation
The Vioxx Litigation
Print Mail
Part II
By Ted Frank
Posted: Thursday, December 15, 2005
WORKING PAPERS
AEI Online  (Washington)
Publication Date: December 14, 2005

Download file This essay is available here as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Abstract

Part I of this AEI Working Paper examined the history of Vioxx and asked questions about potential over-deterrence from having manufacturers bear the full measure of the social cost of drugs through strict products liability or failure-to-warn claims in the context of two early lawsuits brought against its maker, Merck. This installment looks at the problems presented by the Vioxx cases for the litigation system as a whole.

Ted Frank is a resident fellow and director of the Liability Project at AEI.

Related Links
Part I: The Vioxx Litigation
Liability Project
AEI Working Paper Series
AEI Print Index No. 19382


Also by Ted Frank
Recent Articles
The Current State of Consumer Arbitration
Jackpot Justice Gets New Meaning
The Trouble with the Civil Gideon Movement
On the Issues

On the Issues  
In the most recent installment of On the Issues, AEI scholars examine the ways that the U.S. auto industry can survive the current economic crisis without a government bailout.


How to Fix Medicare
How to Fix Medicare: Let's Pay Patients, Not Physicians

Should Medicare pay for patient expenses the way automobile insurers pay for car-repair bills? In How to Fix Medicare, health economist Roger Feldman argues that a radical shift in Medicare policy is not only possible but imperative.