About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  No Child Left Behind: Trends and Issues
No Child Left Behind: Trends and Issues
Print Mail
By Frederick M. Hess
Posted: Wednesday, July 11, 2007
ARTICLES
The Book of the States  (Council of State Governments)
Publication Date: July 1, 2007

Resident Scholar Frederick M. Hess  
Resident Scholar
Frederick M. Hess
 
The No Child Left Behind Act is the most ambitious piece of education legislation ever enacted by Congress. Designed to promote accountability and prod states to address educational inequities, NCLB includes significant provisions regarding assessment, sanctions for low-performing schools and districts, teacher quality and standards for educational research.

On Jan. 8, 2002, surrounded by members of both the Democratic and Republican congressional leadership, President George W. Bush signed No Child Left Behind (NCLB) into law. NCLB is the nation's most significant federal legislation on K-12 schooling since the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965, and the most ambitious federal intervention in a domain long regarded as the preserve of state and local government.

Enacted just months after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Congress approved NCLB by large, bipartisan majorities. The U.S. Senate supported the new law 87-10, and the House of Representatives endorsed it 381-41. Emerging from an exhaustive year of negotiations, NCLB refashioned federal education policy in the areas of testing, accountability and teacher quality. More than anything else, NCLB was a demand by Washington, D.C. policymakers that state and local officials do something about low-performing schools.

Download file Click here to view the full text of this article as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Frederick M. Hess is a resident scholar and director of education policy studies at AEI.

Related Links
Related article on fixing No Child Left Behind by Hess
Related event on the status of No Child Left Behind
Related book coauthored by Hess on No Child Left Behind
Source Notes:   This is a chapter of The Book of the States 2007 Edition, vol. 39 (Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments, 2007), pp. 480-486.
AEI Print Index No. 21968


Also by Frederick M. Hess
Recent Articles
Silver Cloud, Dark Lining
Bush the Hall Monitor
Teacher Pay and 21st-Century School Reform
Latest Book
The Future of Educational Entrepreneurship
Possibilities for School Reform
Energy and Environment Outlook

Energy and Environment Outlook  
In the latest issue of Energy and Environment Outlook, Kenneth P. Green and Aparna Mathur say that while we think of energy consumption in terms of big-ticket items, a great deal of the energy we use is embedded in the things we buy.


How to Fix Medicare
How to Fix Medicare: Let's Pay Patients, Not Physicians

Should Medicare pay for patient expenses the way automobile insurers pay for car-repair bills? In How to Fix Medicare, health economist Roger Feldman argues that a radical shift in Medicare policy is not only possible but imperative.