About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  Losing the Race
Losing the Race
Print Mail
By Newt Gingrich, Roy Romer
Posted: Thursday, December 13, 2007
ARTICLES
Washington Times  
Publication Date: December 13, 2007

 
Senior Fellow
Newt Gingrich
 
It's report-card time again for America's education system, and, unfortunately, our schools have once again brought home a failing grade. The latest round of international test scores paints a grim picture for the United States.

The new results were released from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), which tested hundreds of thousands of 15-year-old students from 30 industrialized countries. The results, which were released last week, show that American students are below average in math and science. Out of 30 industrialized nations, American students rank 25th in math and 21st in science, and our average scores on both tests are below the U.S. averages from the 2003 test. America is falling behind its global competitors and the economic security of our children is at risk.

Nations like Germany, Japan and South Korea are demonstrating a superior ability to teach their kids, and we don't need a crystal ball to predict that capital investments and high-paying jobs are going to flow to those nations with the best educated workforce.

If an American corporation produced such mediocre outcomes, then the CEO would be fired immediately. Yet, American schools continue to churn out below-average students with no fear of consequences.

The discouraging part of our declining test scores is what it says about our nation's long-term well-being. From the light bulb to the microchip, the United States historically has been at the forefront of developing groundbreaking technology. Why? Because the United States consistently developed or attracted the world's greatest scientific minds.

But as we lose that intellectual advantage, we also lose an economic advantage. Nations like Germany, Japan and South Korea are demonstrating a superior ability to teach their kids, and we don't need a crystal ball to predict that capital investments and high-paying jobs are going to flow to those nations with the best educated workforce.

The crisis in schools is so severe that inaction is potentially devastating, which is why the nation's next president should lead the charge to systematically fix America's failing schools. The next president cannot do this alone; he or she must work collectively with our nation's governors, state and local leaders, teachers and parents to improve education in this country.

Just like Sputnik challenged our supremacy of the world and inspired greater emphasis in science and math, ultimately resulting in winning the race to the moon, now is the time for Americans to work together to solve the crisis in education. The next president must make education a priority and offer bold education plans to improve our schools and ensure the economic security of our children.

Why are our international peers outperforming us? There are clear, common threads between the education systems of the highest-performing nations. These countries have established uniform, rigorous standards, invested in their teachers and given more time and support to their students.

We need greater expectations and higher education standards. The reliance on computer technology has made math and science more important than ever. Yet by the end of 8th grade, what passes for the U.S. math curriculum is two years behind the math being learned by students in foreign countries. We need modern academic standards that will ensure kids are better prepared for today's workplace demands.

Another area that merits closer inspection is school calendars. Our current academic years continue to be scheduled as if they are straight out of the 19th-century agrarian model, when kids were needed during the afternoons and summers to help perform work around the home or farm. As a result, American children spend less time learning than their foreign peers. If we expect American students to be competitive, then we must find ways to get them more effective classroom time.

Finally, our greatest asset in education is our teachers, and we need new ways to attract and retain the best educators. Seven in 10 recent college graduates think teaching doesn't offer good opportunities for advancement and they are right. If we want highly qualified and motivated teachers, then we must re-examine the ways we pay teachers and find ways to reward them for teaching complex subjects or taking on difficult assignments.

Making these changes doesn't require a federal takeover over of schools, but it requires national leaders who spur others into action. The individuals now seeking the presidency should use their time in the spotlight to begin sounding the drumbeat for improving our schools. If we want a 21st century workforce, we can begin by building 21st-century classrooms.

Newt Gingrich is a senior fellow at AEI. Former Colorado governor Roy Romer is chairman of Strong American Schools.

Related Links
Related book by Gingrich: Winning the Future
AEI's Education Outlook series
Related event on the No Child Left Behind Act
AEI Print Index No. 22528


Also by Newt Gingrich
Recent Articles
Ethanol, Pro and Con
Saving Time and Money
Before There Was Goldwater or Reagan, There Was Bill Buckley
Latest Book
Real Change
From the World That Fails to the World That Works
On the Issues

On the Issues  
In the most recent installment of On the IssuesScott Gottlieb, M.D., discusses effective ways of distributing information on off-label uses of pharmaceuticals. 


Air Quality in America
Air Quality in America

This detailed, data-driven book rebuts mistaken perceptions that U.S. air quality is bad by documenting marked improvements over the past decades.