About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  Higher Taxes for Whom?
Higher Taxes for Whom?
Print Mail
Letter to the Editor
By Alan D. Viard
Posted: Monday, March 24, 2008
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
New York Times  
Publication Date: March 23, 2008

Resident Scholar Alan D. Viard  
Resident Scholar Alan D. Viard
 
Although Mr. Stein is right that tax increases will be part of the solution to the long-run fiscal imbalance, he misses the mark in recommending "much higher taxes on the truly rich."

While the wealthy have large amounts of disposable income, only limited revenue can be extracted from them without steep marginal tax rate increases that would depress saving and investment. The revenue-raising net must therefore be cast more widely. In addition to telling the American people that tax increases and entitlement cuts are coming, the next president needs to deliver an even less welcome message: Those measures will largely hit the middle class.

Alan D. Viard is a resident scholar at AEI.

Related Links
Related article on tax reform by Viard


Also by Alan D. Viard
Recent Articles
Data Contradict Johnston's Statement about Redistribution
Viard Replies to Johnston
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Balkanization for Some, but Not All, Bonds
Health Policy Outlook

In the latest issue of Health Policy Outlook, Michael S. Greve and Philip Wallach expose the damage that Medicaid is doing to Arizona's--and other states'--fiscal health.


Air Quality in America
Air Quality in America

This detailed, data-driven book rebuts mistaken perceptions that U.S. air quality is bad by documenting marked improvements over the past decades.