About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  Encouraging Diverse Suppliers
Encouraging Diverse Suppliers
Print Mail
By Frederick M. Hess, Bruno V. Manno
Posted: Thursday, December 4, 2008
ARTICLES
Center on Reinventing Public Education  
Publication Date: December 1, 2008

 
Resident Scholar
Frederick M. Hess
 
Much of today's K-12 education discussion focuses on boosting the "supply" of quality district or charter schools. Such conversations typically emphasize creating new schools through charter school start-up funds; incubating charter management organizations through philanthropic measures; expanding voucher programs or lifting charter caps; or boosting public school choice programs, including through the public choice and supplemental service provisions of No Child Left Behind. Supply-side activities also feature measures to police the quality of these new schools through testing, No Child Left Behind-style accountability, and charter school authorizing. Much has been learned along the way, although we are far short of fostering a dynamic, quality-conscious supply side.

In these discussions, a lot of attention is also devoted to the demand side of the "supply-demand" equation. It consists largely of passionate rhetoric regarding the value of school choice, the number of parents seeking such choice, and efforts to make available the information families need to make wise decisions. Largely ignored is the demand for anything that is less than a complete school. So the need for textbooks, data analysis capability, or cost-effective educational strategies rarely enters the choice discussion.

Four related factors deserve mention on this count. First, there is a growing set of demand-side "consumers" who are neither parents nor traditional students. School districts and charter management organizations (CMOs) shop for different services to purchase rather than provide directly. Principals search for cost-effective reading and remediation programs. Teachers seek genuine professional development and effective assessment tools. Students who drop out or lose interest shop for an engaging learning environment that prepares them for adult success. . . .

Download file Click here to view the full text of this article as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Frederick M. Hess is a resident scholar and the director of education policy studies at AEI. Bruno V. Manno is a senior associate for education at the Annie E. Casey Foundation.

Related Links
Related article on supply and school reform by Hess
Related article on school choice by Hess
Related article on No Child Left Behind by Hess
Source Notes:   F. Hess and B. Manno. 2008. "Encouraging Diverse Suppliers" Hopes, Fears, & Reality: A Balanced Look at American Charter Schools in 2008. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, 43-50.
AEI Print Index No. 23736


Also by Frederick M. Hess
Recent Articles
Bush the Hall Monitor
Teacher Pay and 21st-Century School Reform
Why LBJ Is Smiling
Latest Book
The Future of Educational Entrepreneurship
Possibilities for School Reform
Education Outlook

Education Outlook small (small, for highlight)  

In the
December issue of Education Outlook, Frederick M. Hess examines how the Bush administration's signature No Child Left Behind Act dramatically expanded the federal role in education.


Innovation and Technology Adoption in Health Care Markets
Innovation and Technology Adoption in Health Care Markets

Anupam B. Jena and Tomas J. Philipson argue that the use of cost-effectiveness analysis to curb health care spending may do more harm than good.