About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  Well-Paid CEOs Enrich U.S.; With 5% of World's Population, USA Home to Half of Largest Companies
Well-Paid CEOs Enrich U.S.; With 5% of World's Population, USA Home to Half of Largest Companies
Print Mail
By James K. Glassman
Posted: Tuesday, December 26, 2006
ARTICLES
USA Today  
Publication Date: December 26, 2006

Politicians are in a tizzy over how much corporate leaders make--about $8 million this year for CEOs of S&P 500 companies, according to the Financial Times. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., has even introduced a bill titled "The Protection Against Executive Compensation Abuse Act.

Resident Fellow James K. Glassman  
Resident Fellow James K. Glassman
 
"Yes, CEO pay--including the record bonuses paid this year to heads of Wall Street firms such as Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs--is attention-grabbing and has increased sixfold over the past 25 years. But, as economists Xavier Gabaix of MIT and Augustin Landier of NYU concluded in a study in July, that increase "can be fully attributed to the sixfold increase in market capitalization of large U.S. companies during that period." CEOs get paid more because they run bigger, more valuable companies.

Critics, notably Lucian Bebchuk of Harvard, argue that corporate boards are held captive by CEOs, who essentially dictate their own pay. Actually, though, rising pay has coincided with a trend toward more powerful and independent boards.

Kevin J. Murphy and Jan Zabojnik of the University of Southern California offer a more sensible explanation: Our new global high-tech economy, companies are less likely to promote insiders who may be chummy with the board and instead pick CEOs outside not just the firm but even the sector--take Alan Mulally, who came to Ford from Boeing.

These talented generalists are scarce and can have a huge effect on profits. Sure, they command high pay. Too high? The Yankees' Alex Rodriguez earned $29 million from June 2005 to this summer. Jeff Immelt of General Electric makes less than Dr. Phil does. If a good CEO can boost profits by $200 million, he's easily worth $10 million, or more.

Certainly, some CEOs, like some ballplayers, make more than they deserve. Angry shareholders have a remedy--dump the stock. The bigger problem, as we show in The American, the magazine I edit, is that publicly traded companies--because of pressure from politicians, the media and unions--could be underpaying CEOs. The best and brightest managers are migrating to private-equity firms, hedge funds and privately owned businesses out of the spotlight.

With 5% of the world's population, the USA is home to half the world's largest companies. Our system of compensating CEOs has served the nation well. Let's not let politicians mangle it.

James K. Glassman is a resident scholar at AEI and editor in chief of The American.

Related Links
AEI's Economic Outlook series
AEI Print Index No. 21058


Development Policy Outlook

Environmental Policy Outlook  
In the latest issue of Development Policy Outlook, Megan Davy examines China's emergence in the world market and its effect on Latin America's economic future.


Research Highlights  
Find out what research projects and publications AEI scholars are currently working on.