About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  Should No Child Left Behind Be Reauthorized?
Should No Child Left Behind Be Reauthorized?
Print Mail
By Charles Murray
Posted: Tuesday, July 10, 2007
ARTICLES
Kansas City Star  
Publication Date: July 9, 2007

W. H. Brady Scholar Charles Murray  
W. H. Brady Scholar
 Charles Murray
 
Test scores are the last refuge of the No Child Left Behind Act. They have to be, because so little else about the act is attractive.

The act takes a giant step toward nationalizing elementary and secondary education, a disaster for federalism. It pushes classrooms toward relentless drilling, not something that inspires able people to become teachers or makes children eager to learn. It holds good students hostage to the performance of the least talented, at a time when the economic future of the country depends more than ever on the performance of the most talented.

The federal government is doling out rewards and penalties to school systems across the country based on changes in pass percentages. It is an uninformative measure for many reasons, but when it comes to measuring one of the central outcomes sought by No Child Left Behind, the closure of the achievement gap that separates poor students from rich, Latino from white, and black from white, the measure is beyond uninformative. It is deceptive.

Charles Murray is the W. H. Brady Scholar at AEI.

Related Links
Related event featuring Murray on whether NCLB is leaving children behind
Related On the Issues on education, intelligence, and America's future by Murray
Source Notes:   This article is the "con" side of a pro/con debate in the Kansas City Star on the merits of No Child Left Behind. The "pro" side was taken by the editorial page of the Washington Post.
AEI Print Index No. 21955


Also by Charles Murray
Recent Articles
Should the Obama Generation Drop Out?
Good Teachers in Bad Times
Down With the Four-Year College Degree!
Latest Book
Real Education
Four Simple Truths for Bringing America's Schools Back to Reality
Education Outlook

Education Outlook small (small, for highlight)  

In the
December issue of Education Outlook, Frederick M. Hess examines how the Bush administration's signature No Child Left Behind Act dramatically expanded the federal role in education.


Filter by Subject
Menus That Fit Your Needs

When browsing page listings, you can filter what you are seeing by subject matter:

  • all subjects (the default)
  • economics
  • foreign & defense
  • political & social

For example, someone interested in economic policy can filter a list of recent commentary so as to view material on only that issue.

Look for the filter bar near the top of menu pages, above the red page title and the "breadcrumb" trail of links.

For an even narrower focus, the website's research section organizes online offerings by specific subject.