About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  The Ability of Various Measures of Fatness to Predict Application for Disability Insurance
The Ability of Various Measures of Fatness to Predict Application for Disability Insurance
Print Mail
By Richard Burkhauser, John H. Cawley, Maximilian Schmeiser
Posted: Thursday, October 16, 2008
WORKING PAPERS
University of Michigan Retirement Research Center  
Publication Date: September 15, 2008

This paper compares a variety of measures of fatness (e.g. BMI, waist circumference, waist-tohip ratio, percent body fat) in terms of their ability to predict application for Social Security Disability Insurance (DI). This is possible through a recent linkage of the National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III to Social Security Administration (SSA) administrative records.

Our results indicate that the measure of fatness that best predicts application for DI varies by race and gender. For white men, BMI consistently predicts future application for DI. For white women, almost all are consistently predictive. For black men, none predict application. For black women, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio are the only significant predictors of DI application. This variation across race and gender suggests that the inclusion of alternative measures of fatness in social science datasets should be considered, and that researchers examining the impact of fatness on social science outcomes should examine the robustness of their findings to alternative measures of fatness. . . .

Download file Click here to view this paper as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Richard Burkhauser is a visiting scholar at AEI. John Cawley is an associate professor at Cornell University. Maximilian Schmeiser is an assistant professor at the University of Wisconson-Madison.

 

Related Links
Related article on income inequality by Burkhauser
Related article on social security reform by Bill Thomas and Alex Brill
Related article on social security financing projections by Andrew G. Biggs


Also by Richard Burkhauser
Recent Articles
What's Been Happening to United States Income Inequality?
Measuring Labor Earnings Inequality Using Public-Use March Current Population Survey Data
Curing the Dutch Disease: Lessons for United States Disability Policy
Latin American Outlook

In the latest edition of Latin American Outlook, Roger F. Noriega outlines specific ways president-elect Barack Obama can pursue successful U.S.-Latin American relations.


Personalize Your AEI.org Experience

To receive e-mail notifications when events or articles relating to your interests are posted on AEI.org, or simply to set up a personalized page on the website with these items, visit My AEI. Watch for specific

  • scholars
  • subject areas
  • projects
  • event series