About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  The Business Offense
The Business Offense
Print Mail
By Ben J. Wattenberg
Posted: Thursday, June 21, 2001
ARTICLES
The Washington Times  
Publication Date: June 21, 2001

President Bush and his administration take guff from Democrats because they are "oil men" and "corporate chieftains" who are sympathetic to "business interests" and "special interests," which shape his policies with "campaign contributions" and "pollute the environment." In response, Mr. Bush seems often to be on the defensive. His photo-ops read: "As Green As Thou." Big mistake. He should brag on his business connections.

When Democrats take office their top appointees typically come from government, law and the academy. Nothing wrong with that. In 1993 Bill Clinton said his Cabinet would "look like America." Actually, it looked like what it was: rich lawyers of two genders and two races.

Now come the Bushies. Like most Republican administrations, their talent pool comes mostly from the commercial arena but with earlier government credentials. Mr. Bush successfully ran a baseball team and tried unsuccessfully to build an oil company in Texas, an "oil state," of which he was later governor, re-elected by a landslide. Vice President Richard Cheney, after several decades in high government positions, was the CEO of Haliburton, a premier oil exploration company.

After government service, Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill was the CEO of aluminum giant Alcoa. Defense Secretary Don Rumsfeld was a young congressman, a White House aide and CEO of the pharmaceutical company Searle. The director of the Office of Management and Budget, Mitch Daniels, had served in government and comes back straight from the corporate suite of a pharmaceutical giant, Eli Lilly.

As Casey Stengel said, those are true facts. Mr. Bush can't deny it. He shouldn't. And when Democrats beat up on him for his corporate ties, he should say, "Yes, and damn proud of it."

How?

(1) Business 'R' Us. More than half of all Americans (52 percent, and rising) now own equity shares of American corporations, typically through retirement plans and/or mutual funds. Some of these holdings are small today. But as Albert Einstein said, the most powerful force in the universe is compound interest. Since the 1790s, stocks have appreciated in value by 7 percent per year after inflation, including dividends.

If you invest $1,000 at age 22 at 7 percent it doubles in about 10 years, and in 50 years, at a retirement age of 72, it would be worth about $29,000 after inflation. But suppose business is not so good and stocks only appreciate at 5 percent. You end up with $11,000. Or if business is really good, appreciating at 9 percent, the figure is $74,000. The swing between "business is good" and "business is not so good" is almost sevenfold, for voters.

(2) Business produces the goods and services we love and we need. Consider two industries under recent attack: energy and pharmaceuticals.

With a diminished supply of energy, you have, uh, California. If the (commercially owned) power plants can't supply enough energy for a population that is growing and seeking a higher standard of living, the lights go off, and so does the air conditioning. Gasoline prices go up, de-mobilizing the middle and lower classes, who can't afford gas at $2.50 per gallon to take a weekend trip or even a long commute. Energy companies, that is, businesses, make our world what it is, which is better than one without light, mobility and what President Bush might call coolity.

The pharmaceutical companies may have an even higher claim on our hearts, even though they were a favorite target of candidate Al Gore. The human genome has been mapped. In the pipeline there are cancer drugs and medications for Alzheimer's. The era of the drug breakthrough is likely just beginning. Some estimates put the costs of bringing a new drug to market at about half a billion dollars. Pharmaceutical companies can't deliver if their risks don't offer potential rewards. Rigid price controls diminish those rewards, and the drugs may be delayed, for thee and for me. Paint the anti's as pro-cancer.

(Note: Pfizer is one funder of my weekly PBS program Think Tank. Like most investors, I own both drug stocks and energy stocks in my retirement accounts.)

Finally, business often speaks for you. Labor unions make this sort of point all the time: We protect workers' rights. And in many cases they have, and do. Businesses, and a proud-of-business president, can make the same claim. When overly strict environmental regulations drive companies out of business, or price them out of the market, or turn gains into losses, or erode the bottom line, it is easy to say "Let the polluters pay." But the people who pay the most are those who lose their jobs or find their paychecks decimated voters.

Ben J. Wattenberg is a senior fellow at AEI.

AEI Print Index No. 13075


Also by Ben J. Wattenberg
Recent Articles
Rise and Fall of Nations
Looking to Lieberman
Avoid the Trap of Self-Condemnation
Latest Book
Fighting Words
A Tale of How Liberals Created Neo-Conservatism
Latin American Outlook

In the latest edition of Latin American Outlook, Roger F. Noriega outlines specific ways president-elect Barack Obama can pursue successful U.S.-Latin American relations.


Scholar Photo and Fact Sheet Downloads
Print-Quality Portraits

Need a print-quality portrait of an AEI scholar?

Click on any scholar's name in the Scholars & Fellows menu. In the resulting page, look for the red Downloads heading in the righthand gray box for high-resolution photos and other helpful files.