| Does the Clean Air Act Require EPA to Regulate Greenhouse-Gas Emissions? |
 |
|
|
| An Amicus Brief in Massachusetts vs. EPA |
| By Joel M. Schwartz, Sallie Baliunas, John R. Christy, Chris De Freitas, David Legates, Anthony Lupo, Patrick Michaels, Roy W. Spencer |
| Posted: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 |
|
| ARTICLES |
|
Competitive Enterprise Institute
|
| Publication Date: October 24, 2006 |
|
 |
|
|
Visiting Fellow Joel Schwartz |
| The Brief of Amici Curiae Climate Scientists David Battisti, et al., in Support of Petitioners (“CS Brief”) is founded upon the unsupported notion that the net effect of increasing greenhouse gases on human health and welfare is negative. It argues that greenhouse gas emissions “may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare,” requiring “prompt regulatory action to restrain emissions of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.”
 Click here to view this article as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.
Joel Schwartz is a visiting scholar at AEI. |
|
|
| Related Links |
|
|
|
|
|
| AEI Print Index No. 20804 |
|
|
|
On the Issues
|
|
In the most recent installment of On the Issues, Michael S. Greve argues that the federal government should not go crazy in bailing out the states.
|
|
|
|
|
