About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  Operation Iraqi Freedom
Operation Iraqi Freedom
Print Mail
A Strategic Assessment
Posted: Friday, July 23, 2004
PRESS RELEASES
AEI Online  (Washington)
Publication Date: July 23, 2004
Operation Iraqi Freedom  

Download file This press release is available in Adobe Acrobat PDF format.

Why did the United States go to war in Iraq--and what does it seek to accomplish there? 

In Operation Iraqi Freedom: A Strategic Assessment (July 23, 2004; AEI Press), Thomas Donnelly draws on firsthand research he conducted in postwar Iraq and analyzes the conventional and counterinsurgency campaigns waged by the U.S. military in the region, as well as their significance for the broader war on terrorism. Looking beyond the prewar debate in the UN Security Council and postwar recriminations over weapons of mass destruction, Donnelly traces the origins of the Iraq war to more than twenty-five years of unraveling political order in the Middle East and to President George W. Bush's strategic insight--in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks--that America will not be safe until the Middle East is free.  

Among Donnelly's observations are:   

  • The Iraq campaign to topple Saddam Hussein, and the counterinsurgency to provide security for the political reconstruction of Iraq, are parts of the "war on terrorism." Properly understood, this war is a struggle to build a decent, more democratic, less violent order throughout the "greater Middle East."   
  • Military planning did not fully reflect the president's new strategy. The Pentagon's desire to fight a quick war ultimately undercut its ability to fight a decisive war. "The Bush administration has charted the correct strategy in Iraq," Donnelly explains, "but has failed to match its military means to its political ends. . . . President Bush asked for a campaign to achieve regime change, but what he got was a campaign of regime removal."   
  • The difficulties of the counterinsurgency campaign are directly related to the conduct of the invasion: the just-in-time plan magnified minor problems such as delays because of weather and the resistance by the Saddam fedayeen in the south of Iraq. Turkey's failure to permit a northern invasion of Iraq contributed to the challenge of projecting force beyond Baghdad and to the creation of the nefarious "Sunni Triangle."   
  • Despite these problems, Donnelly believes that the counterinsurgency has been "remarkably successful." The insurgency has only succeeded in driving lesser members of the coalition out of  Iraq, and the United Nations has returned to contribute to the country's reconstruction. In addition, U.S. and Iraqi public opinion are holding firm. 

Thomas Donnelly is a resident fellow specializing in defense and security policy at AEI. He has served as policy group director for the Committee on National Security (now the Committee on Armed Services) in the U.S. House of Representatives and has also been editor of Army Times and deputy  editor of Defense News. He is the author of AEI's monthly National Security Outlook

Available in Adobe Acrobat PDF format.
Related Links
More about the book
Interview with Thomas Donnelly
Media Inquiries:
Veronique Rodman
American Enterprise Institute
 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20036
Phone: 202-862-4870
E-mail: VRodman@aei.org


Russian Outlook

Russian Outlook  
In the most recent issue of Russian Outlook, Leon Aron highlights the components of the new Russian authoritarianism and the corporatist state that Putin has built.


Air Quality in America
Air Quality in America

This detailed, data-driven book rebuts mistaken perceptions that U.S. air quality is bad by documenting marked improvements over the past decades.