About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  Key Factors Influencing Income Redistribution from Social Security
Key Factors Influencing Income Redistribution from Social Security
Print Mail
Posted: Friday, February 4, 2005
PRESS RELEASES
AEI Online  (Washington)
Publication Date: February 3, 2005

Income Redistribution from Social Security  
Income Redistribution from Social Security
By Don Fullerton and Brent Mast
AEI Press, 2005, $20.00

Download file These key points are also available here in Adobe Acrobat PDF format.

Mortality and socioeconomic status
Even though the Social Security benefit formula favors the poor, those with higher incomes and more education tend to have greater life expectancy and thus receive benefits for more years.

Income measures
Numerous methods used to measure income affect redistribution estimates. Among them:

  • Annual versus lifetime income
    Measuring lifetime income corrects for the inaccurate classification of some elderly and young individuals as poor, since annual income is only a snapshot view.
  • Covered versus total earnings
    The rich come out ahead when total earnings, rather than only earnings below the cap for Social Security, are taken into account.
  • Potential versus actual income
    Social Security is not as favorable to the poor as many have long assumed when value is assigned to work within the home by nonworking spouses and others who do not have thirty-five years of earnings.
  • Individual versus family income
    Assigning each individual a share of household income has the same effect.

Discount rate
The higher the discount rate—which provide a means of valuing in comparable monetary units all of the Social Security taxes paid and benefits received at different times—the less Social Security appears to benefit low-income retirees. 

Retirement age
Assuming a uniform retirement age should not matter as long as early benefits are valued at an appropriate discount rate and mortality estimates are income differentiated.

Cohort
Since each cohort experienced changes in government policies about covered employment and net tax rates at different points in their working lives and is affected differently by these changes, estimates of within-cohort redistribution vary for different cohorts.

Behavioral Effects   
Studies that assume Social Security policy does not influence individual behavior may be biased since expected benefit levels could affect decisions about labor force participation, age of retirement, and savings.

Available in Adobe Acrobat PDF format.
Related Links
More about the book
Press release
Media Inquiries:
Veronique Rodman
American Enterprise Institute
 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20036
Phone: 202-862-4870
E-mail: VRodman@aei.org


Energy and Environment Outlook

Energy and Environment Outlook  
In the latest issue of Energy and Environment Outlook, Kenneth P. Green and Aparna Mathur say that while we think of energy consumption in terms of big-ticket items, a great deal of the energy we use is embedded in the things we buy.


When Altruism Isn't Enough
When Altruism Isn't Enough

This forthcoming book from the AEI Press, edited by Sally Satel, M.D., explores the key ethical, theoretical, and practical concerns of a government-regulated donor compensation program. It is the first book to describe how such a system could be designed to be ethically permissible, economically justifiable, and pragmatically achievable.