About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  The Disturbing Deterioration of Developed Economies
The Disturbing Deterioration of Developed Economies
Print Mail
By Desmond Lachman
Posted: Thursday, August 3, 2006
ARTICLES
Financial Times  (London)
Publication Date: August 2, 2006

When musing about whether the emerging markets are converging with the industrialised countries, most market analysts mistakenly focus on improving emerging market fundamentals. In so doing, they miss the bigger picture. The main reason for emerging market convergence is that there are a number of developed countries whose economic fundamentals are deteriorating at a more rapid pace than those in the emerging markets are improving.

Resident Fellow Desmond Lachman  
Resident Fellow Desmond Lachman
 
The point is perhaps best illustrated by a reply I received from a seasoned Wall Street trader when I recently asked him where he thought the next emerging market debt crisis would take place. Without missing a beat, he replied that it would occur in Greece, Italy or Portugal. On examining each of these three countries, he found that their public debt levels and public debt dynamics were appreciably worse than those in large emerging market economies such as Brazil, Russia, India and China.

Over the past few years, a number of big emerging-market economies have made great strides in improving their fundamentals. Perhaps the most striking example of such an improvement is offered by Brazil, which as recently as October 2002 was considered to be on the verge of default.

In marked contrast to its past record of public sector profligacy, Brazil's government in each of the past four years has achieved a primary budget surplus in excess of 4 per cent of gross domestic product. This feat has allowed Brazil to gradually reduce its public debt to GDP ratio and improve the structure of that debt. At the same time, the Brazilian central bank has been granted monetary policy independence, which has helped to make the country's dismal inflationary past seem like a distant bad dream. Brazil's external sector has also been strengthened, thereby reducing vulnerability to external shocks.

Brazil is not the only emerging market economy to have moved towards a convergence path over the past few years. China and India have been experiencing very rapid non-inflationary and export-led growth that is reminiscent of the way Germany and Japan changed the global economic landscape in the 1960s and 1970s. The same might be said, though to a lesser degree, of other Asian and European countries such as the Czech Republic, Indonesia, South Korea and Poland.

Even in Spanish-speaking Latin America, single-digit inflation and low budget deficits have now become the norm. This stands in stark contrast to those countries' many past painful experiences with hyperinflation.

In contrast to the improving economic fundamentals in some of the big emerging market economies, too many of the developed economies have allowed their fundamentals to deteriorate in a disturbing manner. This is certainly true of the US, which has a "twin deficit" problem and is now the world's largest debtor nation, with an insatiable appetite for new external financing.

More worrying still is the steady erosion of economic fundamentals in parts of southern Europe (Greece, Italy and Portugal), which has allowed public finances to drift. These countries now have budget deficit and public debt problems that make many emerging market economies look like paragons of fiscal rectitude.

The current sorry state of affairs in Italy is a good illustration of how the distinction between large emerging market economies and developed market economies is becoming more blurred. Since abandoning the lira in favour of the euro in 1999, Italy's public deficit has consistently exceeded the 3 per cent of GDP Maastricht treaty criterion.

It has done so in spite of the fact that Italy's adoption of the euro has permitted its government to borrow at rates not materially different from the French and German governments. As a result, Italy's public debt to GDP ratio has now risen to 106 per cent of GDP, approximately double that in Brazil and Turkey. Even more troubling is the fact that this debt shows every sign of rising further as the Italian economy's loss of international competitiveness saps its vitality.

The upshot is that as talk of default in large emerging market economies such as Brazil and Russia recedes, questions about the sustainability of the public debt situations in places such as Greece, Portugal and Italy will come to the fore. This will be especially the case if these countries continue to stagnate and if their public debt keeps rising. At that point, one will have to wonder how relevant the distinction really is between the large emerging market economies and the mid-sized but troubled developed economies.

Desmond Lachman is a resident fellow at AEI.

Related Links
Risky Business
The False Optimists of the Emerging Markets
Liquidity's Triumph over Emerging Market Fundamentals


Also by Desmond Lachman
Recent Articles
We Can't Wait for a New Treasury Secretary
The G-20 Summit Was a Failure
The Honeymoon Is Over before It Begins
Latest Book
Challenges to the Swedish Welfare State
Economic Outlook

Economic Outlook

In the December issue of Economic Outlook, John H. Makin says that printing money and cutting the payroll tax are the best available measures for avoiding a deflationary spiral that leads to a global depression.


Real Education
Real Education

In his new book, Real Education: Four Simple Truths for Bringing America's Schools Back to Reality, AEI's Charles Murray focuses on four simple, hard truths that are rarely discussed or even acknowledged by educators and politicians.