About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  WHO's Comprehensive HIV Treatment Failure
WHO's Comprehensive HIV Treatment Failure
Print Mail
Will We Learn the Real Lessons from 3 by 5?
By Roger Bate, Lorraine Mooney
Posted: Thursday, November 30, 2006
WORKING PAPERS
AEI Online  
Publication Date: November 30, 2006

Download file Click here to view the complete paper as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

AEI's working paper seriesSummary

It should be a cause for celebration that over 1.6 million people in the poorest parts of the world are now on antiretroviral treatment to halt the advance of HIV. But in a rush to improve access mistakes have been made. These mistakes, many of which were predictable, will be costly in terms of money and lives as drug resistance accelerates and more advanced (second-line) drugs may be unaffordable in poor countries.

The World Health Organization's 3 by 5 Initiative (to treat three million people with HIV drugs by end of 2005) failed to hit its target. Proponents of the initiative nevertheless claim it has generated massive interest to increase treatment and acted as a motivation for those working in health and aid agencies. But as the following paper explains, in some instances it has cut corners, over-strained fragile health systems and increased risk for those it purported to help. A recent report3 states that despite an increase in numbers on treatment in sub-Saharan Africa, AIDS deaths are still rising there.

Unusual features of the 3 by 5 Initiative include a high-level acknowledgement of failure and a comprehensive, (partially) independent evaluation, funded by a major donor. This evaluation vindicates criticisms of 3 by 5 made before and during the Initiative, but makes an optimistic prognosis for HIV/AIDS work at WHO, which seems unwarranted given the findings. Indeed, the international community appears to be moving ahead as though 3 by 5 was a total success. This could be highly damaging to future efforts to combat AIDS around the world.

This paper is the first in a series looking at policy and field practice to find the good and the bad in attempts to fight the AIDS pandemic. Later papers will focus specifically on: the nature and scope of the disease in Africa, whether the treatment model used by Western and mid-income nations is appropriate to Africa; what is being done to effectively combat and treat HIV infections in Africa; and the overall implications of these findings for the future of HIV treatment and control in Africa.

Roger Bate is a resident fellow at AEI. Lorraine Mooney is a is a medical demographer at Africa Fighting Malaria.

Download file Click here to view the complete paper as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Related Links
Related Article on the UN and AIDS by Bate
Related article about HIV/AIDS treatment in Africa by Bate
AEI Working Paper Series


Also by Roger Bate
Recent Articles
From Bangkok to the Beltway
Bad Medicine
China's Bad Medicine Is No Game
Latest Book
Making a Killing
The Deadly Implications of the Counterfeit Drug Trade
Latin American Outlook

In the latest edition of Latin American Outlook, Roger F. Noriega says that Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has made impressive strides, but he needs to take on lingering economic and political reforms.


Making a Killing
Making a Killing

In Making a Killing: The Deadly Implications of the Counterfeit Drug Trade, AEI resident fellow Roger Bate analyzes the burgeoning international trade in counterfeit drugs and recommends steps that governments and law enforcement agencies could take to stop it.