About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title

SHORT PUBLICATIONS
AEI Newsletter
AEI.org Exclusives
The American
Press Releases
Outlook Series
On the Issues
Papers and Studies
AEI Working Paper Series
Government Testimony
Speeches
Book Reviews
AEI Policy Series
The War on Terror

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Short Publications >  FDA Oversight of Drug Safety
FDA Oversight of Drug Safety
Print Mail
By John E. Calfee
Posted: Thursday, February 28, 2008
TESTIMONY
House Committee on Appropriations  
Publication Date: February 27, 2008

I am honored to testify in these hearings on the drug safety and the Food and Drug Administration. Since the Merck Company voluntarily withdrew its pain reliever Vioxx from the U.S. and other markets worldwide on September 30, 2004, the FDA has come under intense criticism for its handling of drug safety. Much of this criticism arose from a series of events involving the Cox-2-inhibitor class of pain relievers (Vioxx, Celebrex, and Bextra), the SSRI class of antidepressants (where the possibility of suicidal behavior is the main issue), the diabetes drug Avandia (involving excess adverse cardiovascular events in clinical trials), the antibiotic Ketek, and others.

Some observers have suggested that we face an ongoing crisis in drug safety and that the FDA lacks the determination and institutional tools necessary to deal adequately with drug safety (Avorn 2007; Curfman, et al. 2006; Fontanaros, et al., 2004; Furberg, et al., 2006; Hennessy and Strom 2007; Kohn and Bor 2004; New York Times, September 28, 2006; Okie 2005; Psaty and Furberg 2005; Smith 2007; Strom 2006; Topol 2004b). Among the FDA's alleged problems are weak leadership, weak incentives to give due weight to drug safety, an institutional structure ill-designed to deal with drug safety before and after drug approval, and a lack of resources. Although the FDA Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA) was designed to address many of the problems, vigorous criticism of the FDA continues.

I believe these criticisms are largely unfounded. On the whole, the FDA is giving adequate, and indeed, more than adequate weight to safety in its deliberations over drug development and approval and in its handling of approved drugs in the marketplace. This was true before passage of FDAAA and it remains true today. To be sure, changes at the FDA and in the entire health care sector could improve drug safety at reasonable cost, but that does not mean that the FDA has been neglectful.

John E. Calfee is a resident scholar at AEI.

Download file Click here to view the complete testimony as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Related Links
Related testimony on the role of the FDA in ensuring the safety of approved drugs by Calfee
Related article on the significance of the Vioxx withdrawal by Calfee
Related testimony on the crisis in the pharmaceutical industry by Calfee
Media Inquiries:
Veronique Rodman
American Enterprise Institute
 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20036
Phone: 202-862-4870
E-mail: VRodman@aei.org
AEI Print Index No. 22811


Also by John E. Calfee
Recent Articles
"Seeding" Sales and Science
The Indispensable Industry
Drugs Kennedy Needs
Latest Book
Biotechnology and the Patent System
Balancing Innovation and Property Rights
Financial Services Outlook

In the June issue of Financial Services Outlook, Peter J. Wallison and Charles W. Calomiris argue that a repeat of the Fannie and Freddie disaster could be prevented by eliminating the government-sponsored enterprise model.


Real Education
Real Education

In his new book, Real Education: Four Simple Truths for Bringing America's Schools Back to Reality, AEI's Charles Murray focuses on four simple, hard truths that are rarely discussed or even acknowledged by educators and politicians.