About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title


LIABILITY PROJECT
About Us/Contact
Events
Books
Publications
Conference Papers
Past Work
Articles of Interest
Scholars and Staff
Links

Home >  Research Areas >  Liability Project >  The Milberg Weiss Indictment and H.R. 5491
The Milberg Weiss Indictment and H.R. 5491
Print Mail
By Ted Frank
Posted: Wednesday, June 28, 2006
TESTIMONY
Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises  (U.S. House Committee on Financial Services)
Publications Date: June 28, 2006

Download file The complete version of this testimony is available here as an Adobe Acrobat PDF

Thank you for your kind invitation to testify today about abuses in securities class action litigation and on H.R. 5491, the proposed Securities Litigation Attorney Accountability and Transparency Act.

The problem of abuses by plaintiffs’ attorneys in securities class action litigation have come to the forefront because of the recent indictment of the Milberg Weiss law firm. But I am reminded of what Michael Kinsley once said: “The scandal isn't what's illegal; the scandal is what's legal.” I, along with many academics, believe that the same is true with much securities class action litigation.

But while there are areas of securities class action reform that are unavoidably divisive, this bill should not be one of them. The small steps taken by this bill are uncontroversial means to reduce corruption in the securities litigation process, benefiting shareholders and plaintiffs’ law firms that play by the rules. I would like to see Congress to take more decisive action to protect investors and the American public from problems created by earlier Congressional action and judicial interpretations of these statutes, but this bill is a step in the right direction.

Download file The complete version of this testimony is available here as an Adobe Acrobat PDF

Related Links
Government Testimony
Liability Project
Media Inquiries:
Veronique Rodman
American Enterprise Institute
 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20036
Phone: 202-862-4870
E-mail: VRodman@aei.org
AEI Print Index No. 20319


Also by Ted Frank
Recent Articles
Blame Port Authority
Battling Zombies
Cy Pres Settlements
Liability Outlook No. 3, 2007 - The Roberts Court and Liability Reform

In the the third Liability Outlook of 2007, Ted Frank analyzes the unexpected turns of the Supreme Court's October Term 2006.


Liability Outlook No. 2, 2007 - The Class Action Fairness Act Two Years Later
In the second Liability Outlook of 2007, Ted Frank gives an assessment of how CAFA has fared in its first two years and what challenges remain in the context of mass torts.

Liability Outlook No. 1, 2007 - Rollover Economics
In this first Liability Outlook of 2007, Ted Frank examines a nine-figure verdict against Ford for alleged "defective design" in its SUVs and analyzes the legal problems that led to it.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Debacle: What Have We Learned; How to Fix It

Henry N. Butler and Larry E. Ribstein detail the scant benefits and monumental costs of SOX.


The Vioxx Litigation

In this two-part working paper, Ted Frank examines the perils of over-deterrence created by the on-going Vioxx litigation.


Harm-Less Lawsuits

Michael Greve describes the origins of consumer class actions and analyzes their theoretical and practical problems. 


Competition Laws in Conflict

In this volume, edited by Richard A. Epstein and Michael S. Greve, leading experts explore routes to a new and better institutional design for global antitrust in the national and international contexts.

Books from the AEI Press


Two Cheers for Contingent Fees

Alexander Tabarrok and Eric Helland argue against capping contingency fees as an effective measure of tort reform.