About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title


LIABILITY PROJECT
About Us/Contact
Events
Books
Publications
Conference Papers
Past Work
Articles of Interest
Scholars and Staff
Links

Home >  Research Areas >  Liability Project >  Prosecutors Gone Wild
Prosecutors Gone Wild
Print Mail
By Ted Frank
Posted: Thursday, July 24, 2008
ARTICLES
The American Spectator  (July/August 2008)
Publications Date: July 1, 2008

 
Resident Fellow
 Ted Frank
 
On March 10, 2008, the New York Times broke the story that New York's governor, Eliot Spitzer, was the unnamed "Client No. 9" listed in a federal indictment involving a prostitution ring called the Emperor's Club. Spitzer's bull-in-a-china-shop tenure as governor made him many enemies in both parties, so his unsuccessful term ended with his resignation just two days later to preempt an inevitable impeachment. Press coverage was still focused on details of the rendezvous at Washington's swanky Mayflower hotel, the role of the suffering-but-loyal wife in sex scandals, and the identity of the vapid femme fatale call girl, when the new governor, David Paterson, took office and dominated the news cycle with his own confessions of tit-for-tat extramarital affairs in the considerably less swanky Days Inn.

Spitzer's fall was so swift that the press barely got around to scrutinizing the tactics of the Department of Justice, quickly dropping the topic as it became yesterday's news. Prosecutors made it clear to the governor's attorney that Spitzer would be more likely to be indicted for a variety of technical financial offenses if he insisted on remaining in office, using the leverage of discretionary criminal charges to bypass the courts and get a resignation. Only one out of ten clients mentioned in the affidavit received particular attention. Client No. 9's sexual predilections and negotiations were described in humiliatingly prurient detail irrelevant to the underlying charges, his identity was leaked, and additional data about the governor's peccadilloes seeped out of the prosecutors' office over the course of the week. Prosecutors, without filing a single official document implicating Spitzer by name, forced him out of office. (In one of the few news stories to explore why the Department of Justice had engaged in extensive labor-intensive surveillance of Spitzer on multiple business trips, officials told the New York Times that they were actually restrained because they didn't try to record the tryst or collect DNA evidence from the hotel room.) . . .

Download file Click here for the full text of this article as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Ted Frank is a resident fellow at AEI.

Related Links
Related article on the work of Eliot Spitzer by Jon Entine
Related book review by Frank: See You in Court: How the Right Made America a Lawsuit Nation
Related event on Eliot Spitzer
AEI Print Index No. 23364


Also by Ted Frank
Recent Articles
Jackpot Justice Gets New Meaning
The Trouble with the Civil Gideon Movement
The Inverted Federalism of Grider v. Compaq
Liability Outlook No. 3, 2007 - The Roberts Court and Liability Reform

In the the third Liability Outlook of 2007, Ted Frank analyzes the unexpected turns of the Supreme Court's October Term 2006.


Liability Outlook No. 2, 2007 - The Class Action Fairness Act Two Years Later
In the second Liability Outlook of 2007, Ted Frank gives an assessment of how CAFA has fared in its first two years and what challenges remain in the context of mass torts.

Liability Outlook No. 1, 2007 - Rollover Economics
In this first Liability Outlook of 2007, Ted Frank examines a nine-figure verdict against Ford for alleged "defective design" in its SUVs and analyzes the legal problems that led to it.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Debacle: What Have We Learned; How to Fix It

Henry N. Butler and Larry E. Ribstein detail the scant benefits and monumental costs of SOX.


The Vioxx Litigation

In this two-part working paper, Ted Frank examines the perils of over-deterrence created by the on-going Vioxx litigation.


Harm-Less Lawsuits

Michael Greve describes the origins of consumer class actions and analyzes their theoretical and practical problems. 


Competition Laws in Conflict

In this volume, edited by Richard A. Epstein and Michael S. Greve, leading experts explore routes to a new and better institutional design for global antitrust in the national and international contexts.

Books from the AEI Press


Two Cheers for Contingent Fees

Alexander Tabarrok and Eric Helland argue against capping contingency fees as an effective measure of tort reform.