About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title


Home
About
Events
Books
Short Publications
Public Opinion Studies
Scholars
Other Links

Home >  Research Areas >  AEI's Political Corner >  Why Vice Presidents Are Important to Governing
Why Vice Presidents Are Important to Governing
Print Mail
By Michael Barone
Posted: Wednesday, July 9, 2008
ON THE ISSUES
AEI Online  
Publications Date: July 9, 2008

Download file This document is available here as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

A version of this article appeared on USNews.com on June 27, 2008.

July 2008

The guessing game about who John McCain and Barack Obama will select as running mates has begun. Vice presidents in the last five administrations have had impressive backgrounds and played important roles--a far different situation from the past, when the function of many mediocre running mates was simply to achieve geographic or ideological balance for the ticket.

Not Exactly a Crime is the title of a book on America's vice presidents published in 1972--a year before Vice President Spiro Agnew was forced to resign for actually committing a crime. The office of vice president has long been the butt of jokes--you know the punch lines--but as we await Barack Obama's and John McCain's choices for vice president, we do so with the knowledge that vice presidents in the last five administrations have been important officers of government. (Yes, including Dan Quayle--see Bob Woodward and David S. Broder's book, The Man Who Would Be President.) How the vice presidency has been transformed is an interesting story that takes us from the Founding Fathers to recent history.

The framers of the Constitution created the vice presidency to solve the problem of succession. They expected that electors meeting in state capitals would vote for two candidates from different states, with the number two vote-getter becoming vice president. It worked well twice. Then the unexpected emergence of political parties produced bizarre results. In 1796, John Adams was elected president and his opponent, Thomas Jefferson, vice president. In 1800, the electors produced a tie between Jefferson and his ticket-mate, Aaron Burr, broken only by an opposition Federalist in the House of Representatives. The Twelfth Amendment promptly passed, providing that electors cast separate votes for president and vice president. Parties would nominate one man for each office.

As late as the 1950s, vice presidents did business from an office in the Capitol and had little occasion to visit the White House.

The result, with few exceptions, was the nomination of mediocrities to balance a ticket geographically or ideologically. In 1824 and 1828, the nomination for the dominant Jeffersonian party was secured by John C. Calhoun, who disagreed bitterly with his two presidents, John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson. After the first Democratic National Convention took on the task of picking vice president nominees in 1832, Calhoun resigned and returned to the Senate.

For 130 years, only one vice president--Martin Van Buren--was elected president in his own right without having succeeded to the office first. Republicans renominated sitting vice presidents only twice in their first hundred years, until Richard Nixon was renominated and reelected in 1956. One vice president nominated across party lines, Andrew Johnson, was so unpopular as president that he was impeached by the House and missed removal from office by one vote in the Senate.

The problem was that everyone knew vice presidents had little to do. Presiding over the Senate is a clerk's job, and opportunities to break ties there seldom arise. As late as the 1950s, vice presidents did business from an office in the Capitol and had little occasion to visit the White House. When Harry Truman was summoned there on April 12, 1945, and told of Franklin Roosevelt's death, he did not know that the president was out of the city; he had met with him just twice in his eighty-two days as vice president. After Truman's first cabinet meeting, Secretary of War Henry Stimson took him aside and told him the government was developing a weapon of enormous power. This was the first time Truman had heard about the atomic bomb.

Truman's unpreparedness may have prompted some later presidents to give vice presidents useful things to do. Dwight Eisenhower sent Richard Nixon on important foreign trips. John Kennedy gave Lyndon Johnson responsibility for the space program. Gerald Ford gave the energetic Nelson Rockefeller some assignments, then dropped him from the ticket.

Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale turned the vice presidency around. Mondale had offices and staffers in the West Wing, regular one-on-one meetings with the president, and access to top appointees. Their example has been followed since. And presidential nominees have not waited until the very last minute at the convention to pick their nominees since Ronald Reagan did in 1980. Potential vice presidents are vetted closely and with a view to how well they could work with the president. An office that was long the vermiform appendix of American government has become a useful organ.

Michael Barone is a resident fellow at AEI.

Download file This document is available as an Adobe Acrobat PDF.

Related Links
AEI's On the Issues series
Related article on the unconventional 2008 election season by Barone
Related article on the politics of picking a running mate by John C. Fortier
AEI Print Index No. 23290


Also by Michael Barone
Recent Articles
Detroit Automakers a Relic of the Past
A Big-Government Generation
Triumph of Temperament, Not Policy
Latest Book
The Almanac of American Politics 2008
Subscribe to Our E-mail List

Send us an e-mail here.


Election Watch 2008
AEI's Election Watch series returns in December 2007 for its fourteenth season, bringing
together AEI's nationally renowned team of political analysts and other commentators. These sessions are essential for anyone who wants to understand the elections.

Public Opinion Snapshot - Who Will Win?

Regardless of who you support, and trying to be as objective as possible, who do you think will win the election in November . . . ? (October)

   Obama        McCain 

 60                38

CNN/Opinion Research Corp.


The Future of Red, Blue, and Purple America
The Future of Red, Blue, and Purple America is a joint project of the American Enterprise Institute and Brookings Institution that focuses on the impact of demographic and geographic change on the 2008 elections and beyond. Selected papers from the upcoming Brookings Institution Press book and presentations as well as audio, video, and summary files from the conference held at AEI on February 28 are available here.

AEI and Brookings have launched the Election Reform Project. The program is a joint effort to monitor the implementation of the Help America Vote Act and to develop a bipartisan policy agenda for further improvements in the administration of elections.