About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all short publications by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Type
- Title


THE TRANSITION TO GOVERNING PROJECT
About the Project
Events
Books
Short Publications
Codirectors
Links

Home >  Research Areas >  Transition to Governing Project >  Make Sure Congress Can Survive the Worst-Case Scenario
Make Sure Congress Can Survive the Worst-Case Scenario
Print Mail
By Norman J. Ornstein
Posted: Tuesday, October 23, 2001
ARTICLES
Washington Post  (Washington)
Publications Date: October 23, 2001

What if United Flight 93--the plane that crash landed near Pittsburgh--had crashed into the Capitol dome on Sept. 11 at 9:30 or 10 a.m.? Both chambers of Congress were filled with lawmakers that morning. Hundreds might have been killed or incapacitated.

The horror of such an attack would soon be punctuated by an additional horror--a Congress unable to meet or act for months, because of constitutional provisions that do not contemplate a disaster of this dimension.

The problem is twofold: First is a provision in Article I that defines the number of members in each body required to be present to pass laws as a majority. Parliamentarians define this quorum as a majority of those elected, sworn in and living. But a massive terrorist attack might leave sizable numbers alive but incapacitated. Even if it could operate with 30 or 40 members, imagine the strain on the system if Congress passed sweeping anti-terrorism laws, huge new appropriations, even a declaration of war, with most of the country unrepresented, or with a radically different partisan or regional makeup.

Members of Congress can be replaced and the membership replenished. In the Senate, where vacancies can be filled either by special elections or gubernatorial appointments, governors could step in quickly. But the Constitution says vacancies in the House of Representatives can by filled only by special election. The past six special elections to the House have taken between three and six months.

The possibility of months without a Congress, at the worst possible time, is unacceptable. The answer is a constitutional amendment to allow for governors to make interim emergency appointments. This would keep the basic structure our Founders envisioned in place but also account for a catastrophe the Framers could not have foreseen. Rep. Brian Baird of Washington has drafted such an amendment, allowing 90-day appointments if a quarter of the Congress is killed.

Congress’s leaders no doubt do not want to confront the possibility of their own demise. But it would be irresponsible to put off or ignore this issue.  

Norman J. Ornstein is a resident scholar at AEI.

Related Links
Transition to Governing Project
Continuity of Government Commission


Also by Norman J. Ornstein
Recent Articles
A Convention and a Running Mate Unlike Any Other
Obama's Narrow Lead Harkens Back to 1980 Election
Leaders Ignore Science Shortfalls to the Peril of America's Future
Latest Book
Vital Statistics on Congress 2008
TGP Newsletter

Fall 1999
This issue covers the appointments process and think tanks.

Fall 2000
This issue covers Preparing to Be President, how Dick Cheney and Al Gore would govern, and the permanent campaign and its future.

Winter 2001
This issue assesses recent presidential transitions, new software for presidential appointees, and revolving door ethics.


The Overstretched FBI

Resident Scholar Norman J. Ornstein  
Norman J. Ornstein
 
The Washington Post

June 4, 2002

Ornstein discusses reforms to FBI checks to improve the presidential appointments process.


Read the "Hess Report on Campaign Coverage in Nightly Network News."

New software released to help presidential nominees with the appointments process.

Read an article from the May 2002 Journal of Politics, written by Matthew J. Dickinson of Middlebury College and Kathryn Dunn Tenpas of Brookings: "Explaining Increasing Turnover Rates among Presidential Advisers, 1929-1997."