There are actually plenty of plans to replace Obamacare, some of which can be scientifically shown to be superior to Obamacare in terms of delivering on those promises. Isn’t it about time we gave such a plan a chance?
Dramatic reductions in our state’s doctor shortage could be achieved far faster and less expensively than trying to solve the problem through an increase in the number of physicians coming out of the medical school pipeline.
What is it about Obamacare that inspires its fiercest supporters the cherry-pick evidence as proof it is “working”?
The day of reckoning for President Obama’s lawless rollout of Obamacare finally will arrive this week when the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in King v. Burwell.
When people say Obamacare is “working” the available empirical evidence suggests that these rosy assesments are either based on some other set of facts or perhaps are grounded in wishful thinking.
As the SCOTUS oral arguments in King v. Burwell draw near, the cacophony from liberal outlets is nearly deafening.
Are free annual checkups for adults good public policy? Al Lewis and Vik Khanna have taken to the Huffington Post to rebuke Republicans for their failure to attack Obamacare on this issue. One problem with their analysis: there is no such provision under Obamacare.
In reaction to the House’s vote to repeal the ACA, President Obama astonishingly said the program was working better than intended. Obamacare has in fact failed on five major promises he said it would deliver.
If the president really aspires to be a transformational president, then John Goodman’s “do-n0-harm” health reform plan surely is not a bad place to start .
American physicians best look out: if Mr. Brill and like-minded reformers get their way in overregulating hospitals, physicians almost assuredly will be next on the chopping block.