F. A. Hayek, Spontaneous Order, and the Mirage of Social Justice
AEI Newsletter

John Tomasi of Brown University delivered the seventh of the 2007-2008 Bradley Lectures on March 10. Edited excerpts follow. A video of the lecture is available at ww.aei.org/event1554/.

Friedrich Hayek was one of the greatest political thinkers of the twentieth century. He is also one of the most misunderstood. I would like to talk about two ideas that make Hayek great but that have caused him to be misunderstood: Hayek's idea of spontaneous order and his attack on "social justice."

In places, famously, Hayek certainly indicates that he is opposed to social justice. Indeed, he wrote an entire book on this subject called The Mirage of Social Justice. Justice, Hayek tells us, is a property of the actions of individual persons. The complex pattern of holdings we find across a free society, Hayek says, is the product of many human actions. To apply notions of justice to the relative holdings of people across an entire society is simply confusion. The phrase "social justice," Hayek tells us, "does not belong to the category of error but to that of nonsense, like the term 'a moral stone.'"

There is a problem with this simple reading of Hayek, however, and it has much vexed Hayek scholars. For while claiming to reject social justice, Hayek often invokes a standard of social justice in arguing for limited government--he says repeatedly that a society of free markets and limited government should be beneficial to all citizens. On occasions when he fears the market system may not have this hoped-for result, Hayek advocates governmental correctives--a guaranteed minimum income, public funding for schools, and an array of social services for needy families--all to be funded by increased taxation. It looks a lot like a concern for social justice.

Despite what many Hayek scholars have said, I see no deep inconsistency between Hayek's rejection of social justice and his expression of social justice-like concerns. To see why, though, we need to consider the idea of spontaneous order. To understand Hayek's idea of spontaneous order, consider a collection of crystals--say, a cluster of rock candy on a string. Candy crystals form when a solution of sugar and water cools. As the temperature drops, the lattice bonds of the sugar molecules begin to re-form. Crystal facets gather on the string.
Now compare the string of rock candy with another complex structure: a Lego model--say, the Death Star from Star Wars. The Death Star is one of the most complex of all the models made by Lego. The large box contains 3,449 small pieces and an instructional booklet with many pages of step-by-step instructions, and a person must carry out each step precisely as directed by the Lego engineers.

The Death Star and a string of rock candy are both complex organizational structures. Yet each is a product of a different type of organizational process. The bringing together of the Lego parts into the form of the completed Death Star requires constant application of goal-directed reason on the part of some organizing agent. By contrast, the molecular units that compose the rock candy are not moved by any unified agent according to some preconceived plan. The components act in accord with general laws of molecular chemistry, but the precise shape the candy will take is beyond the predictive power of even the most sophisticated scientist. A rock candy crystal is a spontaneous system. The Lego model is made.

Apply this to social systems. Within a totalitarian or socialist society, every person is assigned a particular place according to the will of some central planner. With "made" orders of that sort, Hayek says, it does indeed make sense to talk in terms of the social justice (or injustice) of the society as a whole. But a free society--a society formed according to classical liberal principles--is a spontaneous order rather than a made one.

Hayek's distinction between spontaneous and made orders is one of the most important and fascinating ideas in all of social science. But there is one point about spontaneous orders that I urge you to ponder: spontaneous orders, on the societal level at least, are almost always the products of design. This is true even of rock candy. Granted, the molecules interact with each other freely, and the crystals grow spontaneously, but somebody had to stir up the solution, cut off the piece of string, dip it in, and carefully cool the thing down. Any child can tell a good batch of rock candy from a lousy one, and they rightly praise some candy makers and condemn others on that basis.

Within a free society, Hayek argues, no one controls all the activities and positions of all the members. The ideal of personal freedom and the ideal of direct control by so-called experts are in tension. But as with sugar candy, so with human freedom and prosperity: we can tell an experiment that is realizing its goals from one that is falling short. And we rightly praise some societies (and public policy programs) and condemn others on that basis. One lesson we can learn from Hayek is that one can be against expansive governmental programs precisely because one is for social justice.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

Love people, not pleasure
image Oval Office lacks resolve on Ukraine
image Middle East Morass: A public opinion rundown of Iraq, Iran, and more
image Verizon's Inspire Her Mind ad and the facts they didn't tell you
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Monday, July 21, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Closing the gaps in health outcomes: Alternative paths forward

Please join us for a broader exploration of targeted interventions that provide real promise for reducing health disparities, limiting or delaying the onset of chronic health conditions, and improving the performance of the US health care system.

Monday, July 21, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Comprehending comprehensive universities

Join us for a panel discussion that seeks to comprehend the comprehensives and to determine the role these schools play in the nation’s college completion agenda.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014 | 8:50 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Who governs the Internet? A conversation on securing the multistakeholder process

Please join AEI’s Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy for a conference to address key steps we can take, as members of the global community, to maintain a free Internet.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Expanding opportunity in America: A conversation with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan

Please join us as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) unveils a new set of policy reforms aimed at reducing poverty and increasing upward mobility throughout America.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 6:00 p.m. – 7:15 p.m.
Is it time to end the Export-Import Bank?

We welcome you to join us at AEI as POLITICO’s Ben White moderates a lively debate between Tim Carney, one of the bank’s fiercest critics, and Tony Fratto, one of the agency’s staunchest defenders.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.