The sequester—Washington’s mindless across the board budget cuts—is here. Pentagon leaders have until now taken the easy way out by targeting two pots of money for the biggest hits: modernization and readiness. Modernization is the military’s investment in the future, while readiness pays for a healthy force today. While the automatic cuts are not saving substantial sums of money, if they are going to hit defense spending, they need to hit the right targets. Will President Obama allow that and will the Pentagon meet the challenge?
Discover Defense Spending 101 Content
FILTER BY DATEAll Time
FILTER BY RELEVANCEMost Recent
FILTER BY CONTENT TYPEAll Content Types
Acquisition reform is necessary to maintain the Department of Defense's (DoD's) current technological and military supremacy over potential rivals in the coming decades or risk falling behind more nimble innovators.
Jindal’s remarks are in tune with an emerging trend among GOP presidential hopefuls: the belief that a strong national defense should be a defining issue in the 2016 fight for the White House.
While many people inside the Beltway say they want to halt the cuts required by the Budget Control Act (BCA), several factors are conspiring to prevent this momentum from possibly leading to renewed American military strength.
The clear take away from all this is that Senator Rubio has thought deeply about the role of commander-in-chief and that responsibility appears to be a major driving force behind his expected presidential run.
In a major public address earlier this week, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) offered a forceful endorsement of American strength, leadership and internationalism.