email print
Blog Post

Technology is outsmarting net neutrality

AEIdeas

People old enough to do so might remember Gilda Radner’s “never mind” skits. The basic plot was that Radner’s character would rant about some issue, such as the Equal Rights Amendment (which she mistook as an “eagle rights amendment”). Then when she learned that there really wasn’t such an issue as the one she was protesting, she would smile at the camera and say, “Never mind.” If you aren’t that old, here are two examples.

net neutrality

Via Twenty20

Net neutrality is having a Gilda Radner moment. After years of debate, protests, name-calling, and the like, technology is leaving net neutrality behind.

Here are at least three indicators that technology is outsmarting net neutrality.

The 5G effect

5G is the fifth generation of wireless technologies. The standards are still under development, but the technology will transcend today’s wireless and wireline networks, boost capacity severalfold, accommodate high-quality video, and unleash the Internet of Things. And as Bret Swanson explains, it will drive new efficiencies and new innovations across the economy.

What does this have to do with net neutrality? 5G will use network slicing, which enables multiple virtual networks on a common physical infrastructure. Each slice can be customized for specific applications, services, customers, etc.

Network slicing means the end of treating all internet traffic the same — if that ever really happened — which was supposed be a core principle of net neutrality. 5G explicitly customizes the network to different types of traffic.

The Netflix effect

As David Clark, a leader in internet development since the 1970s, explained earlier this year, Netflix and other large edge providers are bypassing the internet. More specifically, they are building or leasing their own networks designed to their specific needs and leaving the public internet — the system of networks that only promise best efforts to deliver content — to their lesser rivals.

What does this have to do with net neutrality? Increasing amounts of traffic are going over networks that use internet protocols but that are not the public internet. This bypasses the ideal that all traffic should be treated equal and allows the largest edge providers’ bits to receive preferential treatment.

The app effect

Mobile internet is leaving wireline internet in its dust in numbers of users and traffic. Mobile internet increasingly bypasses the World Wide Web because about 90 percent of customers’ mobile time is spent in apps, not the web, according to Smart Insights. Apps are gatekeepers that direct customers only to resources that the app makers choose, such as the restaurants and customer reviews chosen by Yelp.

What does this have to do with net neutrality? One of its basic premises is that customers should not be restricted in any way regarding the resources they can reach. But apps, by their very nature, violate that premise. And customers love it.

These three effects, and perhaps others, demonstrate that changing technologies and their underlying economics are bringing net neutrality to an end. So what to do with net neutrality? As Gilda Radner would say, “Never mind.”

Discussion (5 comments)

  1. Bala Kammela says:

    I listened to your passionate interview in radio yesterday. Network slicing is fine but we do not have confidence in ISP’s being reliable and secure routers of those slices if paradigm shifts from Communication to Control (for IoT). What is an issue if each IoT(say Transportation ) stakeholder contracts with ISP(Telecom and Cable) for reliable Communication?
    I think signalling and control should be local followed by 5G as backup.

    1. Bala Kammela says:

      I have a better picture now about where 5G is going. All the airwaves and landwaves(meaning wired) will be taken over by Telecom/Cable and network bandwidth will be sliced in that Eather. Slicing will increase the reliability of Communication. Control part is IoT specific and ISP is just there to prioritize and/or acquire bandwidth.Ideally, each TCP slice should be IoT specific. For example Open-Internet(WWW,EMail) will have existing TCP size whereas, Postal Internet can have whole message in single TCP packet.

  2. Bala Kammela says:

    For Postal Internet, technically they can construct their own infrastructure based on Constitution. I’m not convinced if FCC bandwidth has to go to Telecom/Cable only. Ideally Postal will setup better network and compete with Telecom. Former is non-realtime and latter is Real-Time. After this FCC can be dissolved.

  3. Bala Kammela says:

    There is a need for architectural rebirth of Internet (call it Digital Renaissance).
    Living history is created by the cycle of Thought and Action. Telecom-Internet(WWW,EMail,Telephone) can be called “Internet of Thought”. Postal-Internet is the “Internet of Action” (Civic OR Business action outside the Individual Realm/Boundary). Postal-Internet completes the Internet as well as Digital Democracy.

Comments are closed.